« December 2005 | Main | February 2006 »

January 23, 2006

Georgia man flys to Minnesota for sex with girl he met on the Internet

Kardasz: Read the following sad story of another young person who went away with an Internet sexual predator and consider this tragic truth: We will never have a satisfactory number of law enforcement personnel devoted to the apprehension of Internet sexual predators. Part of the reason is that the offense of luring or enticing a minor via the Internet is under-reported. Under-reporting is partly the natural result of the guilt that a child feels after returning from an unauthorized meeting with an Internet friend who turns out to be a sex offender. The child feels partially responsible for disobeying parental advice about avoiding strangers and will suffer in silence rather than report the offense to parents or police. And without reported offenses, the administrators and politicians who control law enforcement resources will continue to devote those resources to other problems

Internet chat led to criminal sex with Eagan girl, police say

From the StarTribune.com, Minnesota

A Georgia man was charged Thursday in Dakota County with flying to Minnesota and having sex with a teenage girl he met online.

Christopher D. Hipsley, 23, met the 15-year-old Eagan girl on the Internet in 2005, according to the Dakota County Attorney's Office. He flew to Minnesota Jan. 17, sent a taxi to pick up the girl and had sex with her several times, according to a criminal complaint.

The girl originally told Hipsley that she was 17 but she admitted her true age when her sister confronted him.

According to the complaint: The girl did not go to school Jan. 17. Her brother then reviewed her Internet chat logs and found that Hipsley planned to fly from Atlanta and send a taxi to pick up the girl at her bus stop before school. Police found the girl hiding in a closet at an apartment Hipsley rented that day.

He is charged with third-degree criminal sexual conduct. Hipsley was being held in the Dakota County jail on $150,000 bond. His next court appearance is set for Feb. 13.

January 20, 2006

Cynthiana, Kentucky honors officer Hassall

Peers honor Cynthiana Kentucky Police Department officer: Hassall is Officer of the Year

 

 

From the Cynthiana Democrat on line, By Donald Richie, News writer

 

Cynthiana police Ptl. Brian Hassall has been named the department's Officer of the Year. The Officer of the Year award is voted on by Cynthiana Police Department officers on the basis of integrity, positive attitude, willingness to assist other officers and promotion of camaraderie among the department.

 

Chief Steve Muntz said Hassall exhibits all those qualities. “He's a wonderful officer,” Muntz said. “I've been very happy with his work.” For Hassall, the nod from his fellow officers means a lot.

 

“It makes me feel proud that the guys respect what I do,” he said. Hassall takes being singled out by his co-workers in stride. “We're all a team, but its always good to be recognized by my peers,” he said. Hassall is something of a one-stop shop for first response.

 

On top of being a police officer, he is a trained EMT. He trains with the county fire department. He's also been through Community Emergency Response Training, which prepares emergency personnel for major terrorist events and other large-scale disasters. “I respond to any call that I'm available to respond to,” he said. “I enjoy all of it.”

 

Muntz said Hassall is one of the department's firearms instructors as well. Hassall came to Cynthiana after seven years with the Transylvania University Police in Lexington. While at Transy, Hassall and another officer were shot while on duty. For the last nine years, he has been with the Cynthiana Police Department. Brian and his wife Michelle have two adopted children. Their daughter Alex is six and son Sam is three. “He's well liked in the community,” said Muntz. “His whole family is.”

 

Retrieved January 19, 2006 from http://www.cynthianademocrat.com/articles/2006/01/19/news/news01.txt

January 19, 2006

Ethics - Wyoming, Minnesota - Police Chief Terminated

Kardasz: The following article reports a ticket-fixing and property mishandling incident that led to the termination of a police chief.

 

Pangal out as Wyoming chief of police

 

Forest Lake (Minnesota) Times, Posted: 1/18/06, By Cliff Buchan

 

The city of Wyoming and Chief of Police Tony Pangal have parted ways.

Meeting in special session on Tuesday, Jan. 10, the council voted to terminate the chief who had been on paid administrative leave since Oct. 21. The chief was taken off duty following a complaint regarding actions taken by the chief. It was filed with the city by Mayor Sheldon Anderson.

 

Last week’s dismissal followed an internal review by special investigator Richard Setter and city attorneys Tom Miller and Travis Stottler. Mayor Anderson said this week the council took the action based on documentation that revealed Pangal performed his job without the “high standards and integrity” that the city council demands in its chief.

 

Anderson said the former chief’s decision to dismiss two tickets written by Wyoming officers and how he handled forfeited property — vehicles and weapons — were at the center of the council’s move to dismiss.

 

The mayor said in the case of the tickets, Pangal asked the county attorney’s office to dismiss both citations. Both were written to persons with family ties to the St. Paul Police Department.

Pangal is a former police officer in St. Paul.

 

Anderson said the council also found fault with how Pangal was clearing out property that had been forfeited to the city during arrests. In the case of weapons sold by the former chief, Anderson said it is unclear where the guns wound up.

 

At least three weapons were sold, he said. How Pangal sold forfeited property did not follow state procedures, Anderson said. “He (Pangal) was doing what he wanted to do,” the mayor said. “We all like to get things done, but there is a system to abide by.” Attorneys Miller and Stottler reviewed the chief’s activities with property. Setter investigated the ticket dismissals.

 

Anderson said the council was disappointed in the ticket matter because the officers involved with the initial traffic stops were not consulted prior to the dismissal. Pangal did not attend last week’s meeting and Anderson said it is possible the former chief has moved to Atlanta to work in private security. The mayor said he has also heard Pangal may take a position to work in security in Iraq.

The former chief could not be reached for comment. His attorney, Daniel Le, said late last year that Pangal denied the allegations and would take the matter to court.

 

Pangal was hired as Wyoming chief of police in March of 2004. He previously worked in Chatfield as police chief. Anderson, who was out of town and not at the Jan. 10 meeting, said the termination provided no settlement benefit. Pangal has been on paid leave for nearly three months.

 

Sgt. Scott Dexter has served as acting chief of police during the suspension. The council is yet to announce a plan for how the city will go about securing a permanent replacement. The city is also in the midst of a process to seek and hire a permanent city administrator. Sandy Berry has served in that capacity since the departure of Jill Teetzel in 2005.

 

Retrieved January 19, 2006 from http://www.forestlaketimes.com/2006/January/18TonyPangal1186.html

Hero Officer - Steve Baird - Cedar Grove, New Jersey

Kardasz: Click the following link to read a tribute to Officer Steve Baird of the Cedar Grove, New Jersey Police Department.

http://myhero.com/myhero/hero.asp?hero=baird_mms_ul

Ethics - Whistleblowing - Miami, Florida Police Incident

Kardasz: Whistleblowing is a controversial subject. Employees who report the misconduct of fellow employees are sometimes subject to retaliation. Many states now have laws designed to protect whistleblowers. The following story describes a whistleblowing incident in Miami, Florida. 

Whistleblowing Miami Cops Victims, Says Board

Civil Service Board Says Ethics Claims Brought Retaliation

Officers Owed Compensation And Apology

City Has 90 Days To Act

(CBS4 News), By Brian Adams, Jan 17, 2006 10:49 pm US/Eastern

Miami, Florida - Four Miami Police officers who blew the whistle on some potential ethics violations by their bosses received vindication today from the city's Civil Service board, which says their names should be cleared, misconduct charges should be dropped, and the officers should receive financial compensation for actions taken against them.

The city's civil service board says Asst. Chief Luis Vega, and other top brass at the department retaliated against Sgt. Robert Suarez, and detectives Margarita Baro, Lazaro Serpa, and Cesetino Perrera for asking prosecutors and the county ethics commission to look into some personal business for Assistant Chief Vega, which was using resources of the Miami police department to investigate the theft of his identity in other states.

"He didn't live in the city of Miami", said Civil Service Board Chair Miguel de la O, "so the department had no jurisdiction to be investigating it…and as a result of that, we found that they were transferred out in retaliation for the testimony and complaints."

The officers were reprimanded, and claims of misconduct and incompetence were leveled against Sgt. Suarez. The board will recommend to the city manager that those charges be cleared and that he be allowed to retire.

The board also recommends that reprimands against all 4 officers be rescinded and that the department's official newsletter publish an article telling everyone of the abuse of power and injustice committed against these officers.

The board is also suggesting that Assistant Chief Luis Vega, along with 2 Majors, a Captain, and a Lieutenant, receive a publicly admonished for their roles in this.

The board's recommendations are not binding.. But they do lay the ground work for this to be pursued in court, if the city doesn't right the wrong in a way the officers find satisfactory. Their attorney says that means cutting each of the officers a check. "Were talking about sums of money to take them through retirement", said Attorney Terry Guttman Valdes, "had the city not committed this wrong against him."

"I'm very happy", said Serpa, "that finally people can see what we have gone through." Sgt. Suarez says "we're very thankful for the board's decision."

Miami Police had no official comment about the Board's decision, but the Board's recommendations now go to the City Manager and Chief John Timoney, who will have 90 days to act on the decision.

Retrieved January 19, 2006 from http://cbs4.com/topstories/local_story_017171135.html

January 16, 2006

Ethics - Whistleblowing - Vietnam Hero Hugh Thompson

Kardasz: The heroic “whistleblowing” act of Hugh Thompson was very controversial in 1968. Thompson demonstrated extraordinary ethical courage.

 

My Lai massacre hero buried

Wed Jan 11, 7:09 PM ET

 

Hugh Thompson, the US army helicopter pilot who rescued Vietnamese civilians from American troops during the My Lai massacre, was buried with full military honors.

 

Thompson, who died of cancer at a veteran's hospital in nearby Alexandria, Louisiana, on January 6 at the age of 62, was eulogized as a peacemaker during his funeral service in a packed Lafayette chapel.

 

Larry Colburn, a crewmember aboard the helicopter then-Chief Warrant Officer Thompson flew at My Lai, was among those attending the funeral, which included a 21-gun salute and a helicopter flyover. Looking at Thompson's flag-draped coffin, Colburn said: "Hugh was a problem solver. My Lai was a problem. War is a problem. Hugh solved the problem of My Lai without firing a shot."

 

On March 16, 1968, Thompson led the rescue of more than a dozen Vietnamese civilians at My Lai, an incident one American general described as "one of the most shameful chapters in the army's history." "It was probably one of the saddest days of my life," Thompson told a 1994 conference on the massacre at Tulane University in New Orleans.

 

Up to 504 Vietnamese civilians were killed by US troops at My Lai including as many as 210 children aged 12 or younger, according to historians.

 

Thompson recalled that he and fellow crewmembers Colburn and Glenn Andreotta began that day flying a reconnaissance mission over My Lai. Initial intelligence reports suggested heavy activity by Vietcong guerrillas. Thompson's objective was to draw enemy fire so other helicopter gunships could identify enemy positions. But as his helicopter hovered overhead, Thompson recalled, he noted a large number of bodies lying in the village below.

 

"Everywhere we'd look we'd see bodies," Thompson said. Most of the villagers had been shot and left for dead. Thompson and his crew landed and set colored smoke grenades by the wounded for medical evacuation. As they returned to their chopper, however, a soldier appeared and shot to death an elderly woman Thompson had marked for rescue.

 

The trio then flew to another part of the village where Thompson encountered a lieutenant preparing to blow up a bunker filled with wounded Vietnamese. Although outranked, Thompson ordered the lieutenant and his men to stand down. "Thompson put his guns on the Americans and said he would shoot them if they shot another Vietnamese," said William Eckhardt, the chief prosecutor at the My Lai courtmartial.

 

A furious Thompson reported the massacre in progress to army superiors who ordered a ceasefire. Thompson also ordered two other helicopters to evacuate about a dozen wounded villagers to hospital for treatment. Thompson subsequently testified at criminal trials of the army officers, an act which initially left him ostracized by others in the military.

 

Thompson was one of the chief witnesses against Lieutenant William Calley, the only person convicted of a crime in connection with My Lai. Calley was sentenced to life in prison but president Richard Nixon reduced his sentence to several years of house arrest.

 

As a combat pilot Thompson was shot down four times in Vietnam. He suffered a broken back in his last crash and received a Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross. Thompson retired from the army in 1983 as a first lieutenant after 20 years of service. As a civilian, he worked as a commercial helicopter pilot and as a counselor for veterans in Louisiana.

 

In 1998, Thompson, Colburn and, posthumously, Andreotta, were awarded the Soldier's Medal, the army's highest award for battlefield action without encountering the enemy. Andreotta died in a helicopter crash shortly after My Lai.

 

In his last years, Thompson was a guest lecturer at military training academies for the army, navy and marines.

 

In a 2003 address to the US Naval Academy Center for the Study of Professional Military Ethics, he told navy midshipmen: "If you tell someone to do something you had better be right."

 

Retrieved January 16, 2006 from http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060112/wl_asia_afp/usvietnamthompson_060112000522

Ethics - Training - Farrell/O'Donnell Article

Kardasz: The following article describes the trend in training for ethics. Paradoxically, former corporate criminals are now profiting as lecturers of ethics. The trend for more ethics training is partly driven by sentencing guidelines that take into account whether or not a business provided ethics training.

Ethics training as taught by ex-cons: Crime doesn't pay

Demand for classes grows after corporate scandals

By: Greg Farrell and Jayne O'Donnell, USA Today, 11/16/2005

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania – Business students at Temple University heard Walter Pavlo talk about his brief career as a corporate criminal and how it landed him in jail. Pavlo describes a plan he hatched with a friend that netted him $6 million in cash from MCI customers in less than a year. He then tells how the crime almost led him to a nervous breakdown.

"If you have read John Grisham novels, you know that the criminals are cold and calculating," he tells the students. "I was calculating, but I wasn't cold. I was scared. I thought to myself, 'How do I get out of this?' I was constantly looking over my shoulder."

Pavlo is at the forefront of a growing industry ever since the corporate scandals at Enron, WorldCom and Adelphia emerged in 2002. Thanks to those accounting frauds, the business ethics industry is booming.

"There are two big driving forces behind the growth of the ethics industry," says Michael Connor, publisher of Business Ethics magazine. "Sarbanes-Oxley and the U.S. sentencing guidelines. Five years ago, the debate was theoretical. Now, corporate governance is an important part of the analysis on Wall Street."

Sarbanes-Oxley, the law passed by Congress in 2002 after the meltdowns at Enron and WorldCom, called for tighter internal financial controls at public companies. The law also led to revised sentencing guidelines for corporations and individuals involved in fraud. The U.S. Sentencing Commission ruled that among the factors to be taken into consideration when a corporation was accused of wrongdoing was whether management had provided ethics training to its employees. If not, it could be held against a company whose employees had been found guilty of fraudulent behavior.

"We have seen an explosion of growth in professional service providers who help support ethical compliance programs," says Keith Darcy, executive director of the Ethics Officer Association. Darcy points out that his organization -- consisting of executives in charge of corporate ethics and compliance programs -- had 600 members in 2001. This year, his group's membership has exceeded 1,200.

Sanjay Anand, chairman of the Sarbanes-Oxley Institute, which trains accountants and other executives on how to comply with the new law, agrees that ethics has become big business. "We are going through what is referred to as an ethics boom," he says. "Sarbanes-Oxley has raised the bar on the pain that senior executives can suffer as a result of non-compliance with code of ethics. The fear of the expense of training is starting to fade. Companies are realizing ... it costs less to prevent than to cure."

Gary Zeune, who runs a speakers bureau of former white-collar criminals, says that since the law passed, people have "finally started to understand that good ethics is good business because customers will trust you."

There's no teacher like experience.

The focus on ethics has spawned a miniature boom in demand for corporate felons who have done their time. Mark Morze, the former CFO of ZZZZ Best carpet cleaning, served almost five years in prison for his role in one of the biggest frauds of the 1980s. Today, he's a popular public speaker on the subject of ethics. "The interest now is very, very piqued," he says. "A lot of it is piqued by the fear people are having of exposure."

Morze, who pleaded guilty to defrauding investors and banks out of about $100 million, says he would often make $1 million a week during the fraud. He says he now speaks up to 60 times a year to groups ranging from students to FBI agents or accountants, and charges as little as $500 or as much as $10,000 for a keynote speech.

"I've started telling people that (in the 1980s) when you did something wrong, you'd face civil action by the SEC," says Morze. "Now we've seen almost a complete flip-flop, and you might have to pay hundreds of millions in fines. Selfishly, it's good because it gets me more work."

Frank Abagnale, whose early criminal career as a forger and impersonator was celebrated in the movie Catch Me If You Can, had a successful speaking career before the recent wave of accounting frauds. Now, he says, he has to turn business down: "Before fraud got a lot of attention, I used to give 35 talks a year. Now, it's over 100 lectures a year, sometimes four a week."

While Pavlo and Morze talk about the crimes they committed, and the circumstances that tempted them into breaking the law, Abagnale also shares his thoughts on the root causes of fraud in the USA.

"We are living in a society that has an extreme lack of ethics," he says. "We are not teaching ethics at home or in school. You can't find ethics in college. That's just amazing to me."

Exacerbating the situation, he says, is the view among most businesses that fraud and thievery are part of "the cost of doing business." Credit card companies, retailers and others all make budget provisions for fraud. "If you just sit back and say it's related to cost, if you're not doing anything about it, you're helping it," Abagnale says.

If there's any lesson to be learned from the accounting frauds of recent years, it's that at Enron and WorldCom, there were only a few masterminds. Nevertheless, a much larger group of people adopted a "go-along/get-along" philosophy, and before they realized what happened, they were sucked into the vortex of a criminal conspiracy.

Oliver Halle, a former FBI agent who now makes presentations on white-collar crime to businesses and schools, says he couldn't understand how people who seemed to have every advantage in life would make bad decisions in the workplace that often ended up putting them in jail. To make an impression on his audience, he usually brings two white-collar criminals who served time in prison. "I was dealing with people that look like you, me and the neighbors," he says, referring to the real-life examples of corporate convicts. "They were getting into trouble. Why are these educated, upper-middle-class people getting into trouble? What's going wrong here?"

Temple Professor Terry Halbert wanted to expose undergraduates to some of the pressures facing corporate executives. She recruited Pavlo to peak because she wants students to understand how easy it can be to make a mistake that results in prison time. "The last thing we wanted was finger-wagging, or someone saying, 'You better be good people,'" she says. "Most people are good, and then they enter an arena with incredibly high pressure. Many people aren't prepared for what follows. I want to bring it to life."

Crossing the line

And at that class early that autumn day, it was Pavlo bringing it to life for Halbert's students. He recalled the excitement he felt in 1992 when, as a newly minted MBA, he landed a job with telecommunications company MCI. He then talked about the difficulties he had collecting money owed to MCI from a series of fly-by-night companies.

In the mid-1990s, he says, he tried to get MCI to take a $180 million charge to wipe out the bad debt generated by deadbeat customers. But, he says, his bosses told him the maximum that could be written down was $15 million a year and that his bonus hinged on him making the economics work.

In a moment of weakness, Pavlo says, he approached a friend, Harold Mann. Pavlo says he told Mann that he couldn't take the pressure anymore and was sick of squeezing money out of clients, trying to paper over MCI's debts to protect his bonus.

Then, according to Pavlo, Mann shared with him the key to success: "'Walt,'" he says, "'You seem to be the only one in this whole formula who doesn't get it. Everybody cheats. That's how business is done. You've got to cheat to get ahead.'"

Pavlo says he and Mann conned some of MCI's high-risk customers into believing that an angel investor would retire their debts to MCI in return for regular payments to a Cayman Islands account. While MCI never got any payment for outstanding debt, Pavlo got his share of the Cayman Island funds and suddenly was living large, flying by private jet to the Caymans where he had stashed $6 million in illicit earnings.

The criminal activity came at a cost. "I was terrified," he says. Within eight months, Pavlo was near a nervous breakdown. "I was no longer able to function physically, mentally. I was shaking, couldn't sleep, drinking excessively, taking various sorts of pills to help me relax."

Pavlo's crime unraveled when his boss discovered discrepancies between what some of MCI's customers said they owed and what the company thought they owed. Pavlo quit his job, hoping that the investigation would blow over. It didn't. Faced with overwhelming evidence, he pleaded guilty, served two years in prison and is on probation. Mann got a 41/2-year sentence.

Unlike many white-collar criminals, Pavlo says he accepts responsibility for his actions. But the consequences are harsh. No company will ever hire him as a full-time employee. He says he interviewed at a number of places after getting out of prison. "I had two interviews with major accounting firms. I would explain the gap in my resume. They said, 'You can't work here, but we'd like for you to train our people.'"

And so Pavlo's public speaking career began. This year, he expects to earn about $100,000. Based on the speaking engagements he's lined up for 2006, his take next year should double that sum.

Pavlo still has to pay reparations for his crime, to the tune of $6 million. While he was in jail, his wife divorced him, and now more than 70% of his income goes to taxes, child support, restitution and basic necessities. Because he was forced to declare bankruptcy, he can't even get a credit card.

"I had more money and less liabilities when I got out of college," he says of life after prison. But the most difficult part of readjusting to life on the outside is reconnecting with his kids, who are 13 and 15. "Even when they're 30 years old, I'm going to be telling them a version of this story. That's part of the punishment."

Source: USA Today, NOV 16, 2005

http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nfh&an=J0E329817286705

January 14, 2006

Employer Liable for Failing to Stop Unlawful Images

Kardasz: I disagree with Charles A. Sullivan who is quoted below as saying that he thinks the court decision described is "awful".  I think the decision is excellent! Other research I have read indicates that employers are reluctant to report unlawful image incidents involving their employees. I am pleased that the New Jersey Supreme Court recognized the duty that employers have to protect the children who are harmed by unlawful images. 

How will this decision someday effect the law enforcement agencies who become aware of possessors of images of child pornography but fail to devote sufficient personnel and resources to the investigations of those possessors?

The research of Doctors Hernandez and Bourke at the Butner North Carolina Federal Correctional facility indicates that a significant percentage of persons incarcerated for possession of child pornography were also "hands-on" contact offenders. Most of the child victims involved in these incidents are unable to infom law enforcement of the offenses. It is time for law enforcement to step-up and to devote more resources to these crimes. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Employer Had Duty To Stop Workders Porn Surfing  New Jersey Appellate Ruling Disturbs Employment Law Experts 

ABA Journal Report , BY G.M. FILISKO, Friday January 6, 2006

When an employer has actual or imputed knowledge that an employee is using a computer at work to "access pornography, possibly child pornography, [the company] has a duty to investigate … and to take prompt and effective action to stop the unauthorized activity," a New Jersey appellate court has ruled. Doe v. XYC Corp., No. A-2909-04T2 (Dec. 27).

The ruling by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, involved a man who later admitted he uploaded nude photographs of his stepdaughter to a child pornography Web site. But as distasteful as the crime is, several employment law experts find the decision unpalatable as well.

"I think the decision is awful," says Charles A. Sullivan, an employment law professor at Seton Hall University in Newark, N.J. "It imposes a big duty on employers, and it’s a huge infringement on employees’ privacy rights."

"It’s a horrible opinion," concurs Laurie Leader, a professor of clinical practice at Chicago-Kent College of Law who specializes in labor and employment law. "I think this court is out on a limb. It’s almost imposing some kind of strict liability on employers."

But the plaintiff’s attorney, Kevin Kovacs of Bedminster, N.J., defends the court’s opinion as "an important decision and a good decision for potential victims of child pornography."

"The defendant argued that my position turns employers into police departments. But it doesn’t," Kovacs says. "We never argued that there should be full-out monitoring of employees’ Internet activities. We argued that in limited circumstances, where the company has information, it has to investigate, and when there’s child pornography, it has to report it because there’s potential harm employees can do to third parties."

The corporation’s attorney did not return a call for comment. It has until Jan. 17 to petition the New Jersey Supreme Court for review.

The case was brought by a woman individually and on behalf of her 10-year-old daughter, who had been secretly videotaped and photographed in nude and semi-nude positions by the woman’s then-husband. He later transmitted the pictures over the Internet at his workplace. The couple has since divorced and, according to Kovacs, the ex-husband is serving a prison sentence for his child pornography activity.

In Doe, the woman alleged her former husband’s employer, based in Somerset County, failed to take appropriate action when it learned he was accessing Internet pornography sites at work and that, had the company taken the right action, the sexual abuse her daughter suffered might have been prevented.

According to the appellate ruling, in two instances, the company’s computer network administrator and the employee’s supervisor viewed the employee’s Internet site history and learned the employee had been viewing what they believed were pornographic sites, including a site called Teenflirts.org. But they never accessed the Web sites themselves.

The network administrator, however, was instructed to stop tracking the employee’s Internet usage because of a company policy prohibiting monitoring or reporting of employees’ Internet activities.

Before that warning, the administrator and another computer employee told the employee to stop viewing Internet pornography. The employee’s supervisor had a similar talk with the employee on a different occasion. The employee told his supervisor he would quit visiting porn sites at work, but the supervisor later saw that the employee had resumed his activities.

The trial court granted summary judgment for the corporation, saying that the employee’s "conduct at home," which it stated was the molestation of the child, was not under the corporation’s control. According to the trial court, the corporation acted as a reasonably prudent corporation would have acted because, "upon receipt of complaints from [its] employees, defendant instructed the [employee] to stop [his] conduct." It also said there was no evidence the company was aware the employee was viewing child pornography. Because the company was under no duty to monitor the private communications of its employees, "there has been no breach of a duty and no negligence on the part of the defendant corporation," the trial court said.

The appellate court reversed, holding that the corporation had the ability and right to monitor the employee’s Internet activities and that it knew or should have known the employee was using the office computer to access child pornography. It also held that, with actual or imputed knowledge of the employee’s viewing of child pornography on a company computer, the defendant had a duty to either report the employee’s actions to law enforcement or to fire him.

The appellate court, however, remanded the final issue, proximate cause, to the trial court. "We agree in large part with plaintiff’s arguments" the ruling states, "but not with the final leap to defendant’s liability." According to the appellate court, to show proximate cause, the plaintiff must show that harm to the child would have been averted had defendant acted to stop the employee’s activities when it had sufficient information.

Sullivan says proximate cause will be difficult to prove. "This is one of those hard cases making bad law," he says. "Probably, proximate cause isn’t going to be established, which means we’ll have this precedent on the books that imposes this duty on employers even though the plaintiff in this case won’t ever get a dime from the employer."

But Michael Selmi, professor of employment and civil rights law at George Washington University School of Law in Washington, D.C., says the case is narrower than it seems on first read. "The initial buzz of the case is great," he says, "but the duty to report and investigate arises only because the case involved child pornography, which is illegal. Most Internet usage wouldn’t involve illegal activity, and if it were only pornographic sites, the employer wouldn’t have a duty to report anybody."

The holding is also limited, Selmi says, because "the employer had so much knowledge, not necessarily regarding abuse of the stepdaughter, but in terms of complaints from other employees. That level of knowledge, combined with illegal activity, created a duty that wouldn’t typically exist. By no means would this be an easy case for plaintiffs to rely on" in bringing other actions, he says.

But Sullivan says the decision forces employers to monitor employees’ computer use.

"Right now, employers have a right to monitor employees’ computer use," he says. "They don’t have a duty. It’s a huge step [from saying] an employer can if it wants to supervise employees’ e-mail and Internet use, to saying an employer’s liable if it doesn’t supervise an employee’s use of the computer."

Sullivan adds, "There has historically never been a requirement that people report other people for violations of the law, and this court comes pretty close to saying you have to do that."

Retrieved January 14, 2006 from http://www.abanet.org/journal/ereport/j6porn.html

January 13, 2006

Ethics - Decision Making Process

Kardasz: Here are excerpts from an interesting article about ethical decision-making by Joseph Paliwoda. Although the article is written for behavioral health care workers the concepts are also applicable to other occupations.

From Behavioral Health Management, Sept-Oct 2002 v 22 i5 p44(2).

Seven ways to think about ethics: In behavioral healthcare, solutions to ethical problems might not be as clear-cut as they seem
   
Many organizations offer ethics training. This training typically deals with the extreme breaches in behavior. While codes of ethics are typically reviewed during training students can find themselves facing situations that need further clarification. In short, ethics is not always black and white.

Consider this hypothetical scenario:

John is a client at your behavioral health facility. He has a court date coming up and wants to sell his stereo in case he needs bail money to stay out of jail. A worker at your facility is shopping for a stereo. They begin to talk and the worker buys the stereo.

1. What issue(s) do you see arising from this situation?

2. Is there a breach of ethics?

3. If so, how do you address this with the worker?

Many would see a problem with creating a dual relationship with the client, but this situation is not so obvious to everyone. In fact, other factors could complicate the situation even further. For example, what if the worker is a secretary, i.e., a nonclinician? What if the client was about to leave the facility's care the next day?

As the vice-president of a rapidly growing behavioral health organization, I am constantly confronted with questions regarding ethical decisions like the example provided. And I've found that staff, while well intentioned, often need guidance in making appropriate decisions. What follows is the seven-step process (with explanations) that I go through to make decisions and to train my staff on the decision-making process:

1. Gather all the relevant facts of the situation/proposed action.

2. Identify key stakeholders and their interests. 

3. Determine whether this action violates any laws, codes of ethics or organizational policies. If not, or if you're unsure, then ... 

4. Identify the worst-case scenarios. 

5. Brainstorm a solution with the stakeholders involved. 

6. Conduct a "fairness test." 

7. Develop a plan of action to resolve the current dilemma and prevent
future incidents.

To explain: 

1. Gather all the relevant facts of the situation/proposed action. Whenever a situation is presented, it is usually missing some key facts or perspectives that could alter the decision. The manager/decision maker needs to gather as many of the relevant facts of the situation as possible. (For example,see the possible complications raised in the above scenario.) 

2. Identify key stakeholders and their interests. Stakeholders might include
the client, the individual staff member, the organization, the client's family members, your organization's funding sources and society as a whole. Identifying their interests, and how they conflict, is crucial to resolving the dilemma fairly. In the example provided above, the client, worker and organization are all stakeholders. We know what the interests of the client (and possibly family members) and worker are. The organization's concern might be over its reputation (e.g., being potentially viewed as taking advantage of a client's vulnerable situation for self-gain). 

3. Determine whether this action violates any laws, codes of ethics or organizational policies. Clearly, if an action violates the law, the code of ethics or an organizational policy, then it cannot be justified. However, the finding of a violation of the code of ethics might sometimes be disputed by those involved, such as the worker who doesn't understand why she can't buy the stereo, or the client who doesn't understand why he can't sell the stereo to assist himself or herself. This necessitates steps 4 through 7. 

4. Identify the worst-case scenarios. This is where I let my imagination run amok. I, along with the staff member, identify the worst-case scenarios. In the example given earlier, some possible scenarios are: (a) the client is not the true owner of the stereo and is purveying borrowed or stolen equipment; (b) the stereo is faulty and not worth what the staff member is willing to pay for it (thus possibly causing animosity toward the client once this is discovered); (c) the transaction causes a perception that the facility's staff are "taking advantage" of clients; (d) the client complains after the sale that he or she wants the stereo returned. Together, with the staff member, identify and work through all such potential problems associated with the transaction. 

5. Brainstorm a solution with the stakeholders involved. In the example given, some brainstorming ideas might include: (a) encouraging the client to identify buyers through different means (pawn shop, classified advertising, posting fliers at stores, making an announcement at support meetings); (b) identifying alternative ways for the staff member to obtain bargain stereo equipment (e.g., pawn shops, etc.); (c) establishing organizational policy on staff members' purchasing goods or services from clients.

6. Conduct a "fairness test." For a decision to pass the "fairness test," all stakeholders should perceive it to be fair, given all the circumstances.

Subparts of the fairness test include: 

* Does it meet the Mission Test (i.e., does the decision fit comfortably with the organization's mission)? 

* Does it meet the Pride Test (i.e., do you "feel proud" of the decision)?

* Does it meet the Explanation Test (i.e., would you feel comfortable explaining the decision to all stakeholders)? 

* Does it meet the "Front Page of the Paper" test? This is one of my favorites: What is the worst headline you can make from the situation and resulting decision? In the example provided, how about "Program Buys Stolen  PropertyFrom Clients" or "Counselors Prey on Cash-Strapped Clients"?

7. Develop a plan of action to resolve the current dilemma and prevent future incidents. This step will show how much you have learned from previous experiences and how well you explain it to all potential stakeholders.

I suggest that staff in your organization practice this approach in staff meetings devoted to training for ethical decision making. Keep in mind, process is important, even if the answer to some situations is obvious to some staff members. All will encounter "gray areas" sooner or later. Perhaps this will help your organization prepare for the inevitable.

Joseph Paliwoda, MBA, is president of Paragon Consulting Services, Pinckney, Mich. As a CARF surveyor, he provides consultation to mental health and substance abuse treatment providers. For further information, phone  (734) 546-7020 or e-mail jspjoe@tir.com

Heroic Act - Methuen, Massachusetts

Hero cop saves driver after icy plunge

Boston Herald Inc, By O'Ryan Johnson, January 5, 2006 

A 55-year-old Methuen woman is in critical condition at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center after her car slid off an icy road and flipped into a creek, submerging her beneath frigid water for up to 20 minutes, police said.

But she would have been trapped even longer had Methuen police officer Paul Ramirez not driven by Baremeadow Street about 2:30 p.m. and seen smoke rising from the accident, police said.

Ramirez radioed for help, then waded into roughly 3 feet of icy water to rescue the woman, police said. As he did, he sunk to his waist in mud while he used his police baton to repeatedly bang on the car's window in an attempt to shatter it.

``The upper part of her body was fully submerged underwater,'' Lt. Randy Haggar said. ``Our main concern was to keep her head above water and keep her breathing. Until they were able to get the door open, she was fully submerged.''

Fire crews equipped with the Jaws of Life arrived within minutes, cutting off the car door and freeing the woman, police said. Ramirez and Officer Tim Getchell were treated for hypothermia at Holy Family Hospital in Methuen.

Methuen police Chief Joseph Solomon praised Ramirez's efforts to rescue the woman, who is related to Solomon through marriage.

Retrieved January 13, 2006 from PoliceOne.com, http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:jAZG3PccXnYJ:www.policeone.com/police-heroes/articles/122165/+police%2Bhero&hl=en

 

Courageous Act - Columbus, Ohio

Police Officer Called Hero By Colleagues

December 10, 2004

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Relatives of Columbus Police Officer James D. Niggemeyer said Thursday that they were not surprised he charged into the Alrosa Villa nightclub before backup arrived. The 1992 Newark Catholic High School graduate comes from a family of police officers and military veterans, NBC 4 reported.

Relatives told NBC 4 that his grandfather is a retired police chief at Ohio University. Niggemeyer, a U.S. Army veteran, also has relatives who worked in the Bureau of Criminal Investigation, the Pentagon, and other police work.

"He's from such a militaristic, old world chivalristic family," Niggemeyer's former stepfather Steve Detty said. "That means military. That means police work. The whole family's always been on that side of the law."

Niggemeyer, a five-year veteran of the police force, was the first on the scene within two minutes of the first call at Alrosa Villa. He went inside and shot Nathan Gale, who at that point had a hostage. "The community has a hero," said Columbus police Sgt. Brent Mull.

According to police and witnesses, another police officer from out of town who was at the Damageplan concert got the gunman's attention. A security guard led Niggemeyer to a side entrance by the stage, by the gunman who was holding the hostage.

Niggemeyer, who was about 20 feet away, fired one shot, which contained nine slugs from his 12-gauge shotgun, and hit Gale in the right side of his head and upper body. The shooting happened within seconds, less than one minute after the officer arrived at the scene, NBC 4's Nancy Burton reported.

Retrieved January 13, 2006 from http://www.nbc4i.com/news/3989100/detail.html

Ethics - Misconduct allegations

Kardasz: Unusual misconduct allegations from Ontario, Canada.

Runciman `offended' by OPP mugs

TheStar.com, Jan. 11, 2006, By Peter Edwards


Forest, Ontario, Canada — Former solicitor general Bob Runciman says he was offended
by the actions of Ontario Provincial Police officers who made souvenir mugs and T-shirts commemorating the police operation that ended in the death of native activist Anthony (Dudley) George.

"I thought that was an exercise in macho stupidity," Runciman testified yesterday before Justice Sidney Linden at the public inquiry into George's Sept. 6, 1995, death. "I do want to say that I was personally offended ... shocked," Runciman, now Progressive Conservative House leader at Queen's Park, told the inquiry under questioning from commission lawyer Derry Millar.

As solicitor general, Runciman was the top civilian overseer of police. However, he said he played no role in disciplining OPP officers. George was shot dead by an OPP sniper after police marched on Ipperwash Provincial Park late on Sept. 6, 1995. Acting Sgt. Kenneth Deane was found guilty of criminal negligence causing death after a judge ruled George was unarmed. The Stoney Point natives were occupying the park, near Sarnia, because they said it contained sacred burial grounds — a claim later upheld.

Within days of the shooting, officers made up several dozen "Ipperwash '95" T-shirts bearing the OPP insignia, the letters ERT and TRU — which stand for the emergency response team and tactical response units that participated at Ipperwash — and a white feather. There were also coffee mugs with an arrow going through an OPP crest.

Natives were upset, saying the arrow and feather symbolized dead warriors. Runciman also testified he doesn't believe there was political interference in the operation.

Retrieved January 13, 2006 from http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&pubid=968163964505&cid=1136933413271&col=968705899037&call_page=TS_News&call_pageid=968332188492&call_pagepath=News/News

Quotes - Character

A man of character finds a special attractiveness in difficulty, since it is only by coming to grips with difficulty that he can realize his potentialities.
— Charles de Gaulle

 

Good actions ennoble us, and we are the children of our own deeds.
— Miguel de Cervantes 

 

The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.
— Martin Luther King, Jr.

 

 Retrieved January 13, 2006 from www.charactercounts.org.

January 11, 2006

Ethics - Officers indicted in Baltimore, Maryland

Kardasz: Disturbing allegations against officers in Baltimore, Maryland.  

Police Confiscate Items From Indicted Officers

Indicted Officers' Arrests Possibly In Jeopardy 

January 9, 2006 The WBAL-TV 11 News I-Team reported sex allegations against three Baltimore police officers comprise just one part of a larger investigation.Two of three officers turned themselves in Monday to face charges in the alleged rape of a woman while she was in police custody last week at the Southwestern District station. The third officer surrendered late Friday night. A city grand jury indicted the three officers last Friday on six counts of rape, conspiracy to commit rape, assault and misconduct in office.Prosecutors have accused the officers of exchanging sex with the woman for her freedom.Prosecutors have started reviewing cases that involve all the officers named to determine whether any may have to be thrown out due to credibility questions that now loom. WBAL-TV 11 News I-Team lead investigative reporter Jayne Miller reported the rest of the story, spelled out in police documents, raises a whole set of other questions that could have far-reaching effects on the integrity of an untold number of arrests. Court documents reveal that in the Southwestern District the Flex squad is suspected of conducting criminal activity, including stealing from people arrested and planting evidence to make false arrests.The Flex squads are composed of select groups of officers in each police district that are intended to provide an extra level of enforcement to keep crime under control.Miller said the suspicions are contained in an affidavit filed by an internal affairs detective after a search of the Southwestern District in late December 2005.

According to the affidavit, investigators found the following items:

  • 11 Zip-Lock baggies containing suspected crack
  • Cocaine from a duffel bag under an officer's desk
  • Two Zip-Lock baggies containing suspected marijuana found in the pocket of an officer's uniform jacket
  • Vial with white residue on the wall of the office that had been seized on July 15, 2005
  • 13 counterfeit DVDs and four counterfeit CDs
  • Texas Hold 'Em poker set
  • Pornographic magazines
  • Seven cell phones

Any drugs seized as evidence by police are supposed to be submitted to evidence control. Authorities have submitted the items confiscated during the search for testing. The police union pushed for a thorough review into the investigation. "Let's not just look at it and automatically say, it's theirs. Let's do the regular procedure like we do anywhere else. Let's fingerprint, see if it really belongs to these guys. Let's see if somebody was in that office that wasn't supposed to be there that could have possibly put those narcotics there, maybe as payback. I don't know, anything. It's very disturbing," said Fred Roussey, president of the city's Fraternal Order of Police.

The affidavit states that "... (two) officers have been implicated in the theft of cell phones belonging to arrestees." The affidavit also states: "Allegations against (the) officers have been made as to the planting of controlled dangerous substances on citizens in an effort to knowingly make false arrests," the affidavit states. Two of the Southwestern District's Flex squad officers have been indicted in the rape case that led to the search of the district station. Another Flex squad officer was charged some time ago in a gambling case. No other criminal charges have been filed. A police representative declined to comment on the other suspicions revealed in the affidavit, except to say an internal investigation continues. Miller reported the FBI is keeping track of everything surrounding this case. At this point, the FBI has not opened a formal investigation.

Retrieved January 11, 2006 from http://www.thewbalchannel.com/news/5959186/detail.html?rss=bal&psp=news

Ethics - Chicago, Illinois to conduct ethics training

Chicago City Council to Consider Ethics Training Bill

Measure would provide training for 37,000 full-time employees -- plus provisions to keep them from cheating on the ethics training
 
Reacting to a series of City Hall corruption scandals, some Chicago aldermen are proposing that all of the city's 37,000 full-time employees receive ethics training. Alderman Margaret Laurino, a co-sponsor of the bill, told WBBM News Radio in Chicago that she believes the training could be completed online.

According to the Chicago Tribune, Laurino says ethics training is "another piece of the puzzle" in understanding ethics rules. WQAD-TV in Chicago noted that the proposal would broaden an ordinance that already requires ethics training for about 4,000 high-level employees.

Dorothy Eng, executive director of the city's Board of Ethics, said she gets "thousands" of calls from employees with ethics questions, the Chicago Sun-Times reported. "The huge majority of them -- they just want to do the right thing. And they're looking to find out what the right thing is," she said, according to the Sun Times report.

She also noted, however, that there will be checks built into the system to keep employees from cheating on the ethics training, including getting someone else to take it for them. One of the more notable scandals in recent Chicago politics was a fraudulent testing scam designed to promote and hire people who had campaigned for certain candidates, according to the Tribune. The measure needs full council approval before being implemented.

Source: Chicago Tribune - December 14, 2005. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chicago/chi-0512140282dec14,1,4167766.story?coll=chi-newslocalchicago-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true

January 10, 2006

Buddhist Quote - Avoid Mischief

Turn away from mischief.
Again and again, turn away,
Before sorrow befalls you.

Set your heart on doing good.
Do it over and over again,
And you will be filled with joy.

-Dhammapada 117-118

From "365 Buddha: Daily Meditations," edited by Jeff Schmidt. Reprinted by arrangement with Tarcher/Putnam, a division of Penguin Putnam Inc.


January 09, 2006

Internet Crimes Against Children - Pornography

Kardasz: Probation supervisor used computers from his workplace for pornography and other misconduct.  

Ex-probation chief given 4 months in porn case

Perjury charges won't be filed in abuses involving agency computers

Jan. 6, 2006, Harvey Rice, Houston Chronicle

A man who once oversaw about 40,000 Harris County probationers began serving a four-month jail sentence Friday for a conviction resulting from the discovery of pornography in his office computer. Paul Donnelly whispered "I love you" to his wife, Susan, as he was handcuffed after state District Judge Mary Lou Keel pronounced the sentence. After being fingerprinted by a bailiff, he was led to the County Jail. Donnelly, 52, pleaded guilty Thursday to a misdemeanor charge of abuse of official capacity.

The charge came after an investigation into about 1,000 pornographic images and several pornographic movies that were discovered on his office computer and county-owned laptop. After he was led away, a group of former probation employees hugged each other and Assistant District Attorney Donna Goode. Goode had asked Keel to sentence Donnelly to the maximum of one year, saying that he mistreated employees and kept them in fear for their jobs while abusing his authority.

"It's more than a misdemeanor," Goode said. "It's a misdemeanor by somebody in a position of trust." She said Donnelly had made false statements to the grand jury, claiming he accidentally downloaded the pornography and that he was never asked the whereabouts of two county-owned computers that his daughters took to college. Keel had warned Donnelly that he might be charged with aggravated perjury, but Goode declined to press the charge.

Though Donnelly held one of the highest posts in county government, she said, he "is a fraud; he's like a con man ... he is manipulative and he is a liar." ID numbers removed Defense attorney Bob Loper asked the judge for probation and no jail time so Donnelly could remain with his wife and four children. "He is, for all his faults, a person who has accepted responsibility for what he has done," Loper said. "He's ashamed about it, believe me. That's not a reason to pile on."

The sentence came after two days of testimony, including assertions from a district attorney's investigator that many images on Donnelly's laptop appeared to be of girls younger than 17. "When you see these items, you immediately form the opinion that these are very young girls," said Capt. Dan McAnulty, of the public integrity division.

He said he could not prove the girls were younger than 17, but Goode told the judge, "If it is not child pornography, it is darn close."

McAnulty also said investigators discovered that county identification numbers were scraped off of two laptop computers that Donnelly's daughters used in college, one in Florida and the other in Tyler. After that testimony, Donnelly pleaded guilty to tampering with a government record for scraping off the numbers, but prosecutors agreed he would be sentenced only for abuse of official capacity.

The county's state district judges suspended Donnelly on May 12 after learning pornography had been found in his computer. The judges had hired him in late 2003 to oversee an agency that has more than 700 employees and supervises about 40,000 probationers. He resigned in June. Grand jury testimony A grand jury indicted Donnelly in August after two county technicians went to Sheriff Tommy Thomas with disks containing copies of the images found on Donnelly's laptop hard drive, as well as other evidence he misused county computers.

Testimony also disclosed that after the information services division inquired about the two computers used by his daughters, Donnelly said one or more computers may have been stolen from his office. McAnulty testified that he checked police records and found no evidence of a burglary complaint. After the pornography was discovered, Donnelly told information services employees that his 14-year-old son had admitted to downloading the images, according to testimony from Charles Robert Glazier, manager of that division.

Testimony on Thursday also showed that Donnelly had his personal computers repaired by agency employees during working hours and that he downloaded about 3,000 music files without copyright permission on agency computers.

He also used his county computer to purchase peyote, a hallucinogenic plant, on eBay, according to testimony.

harvey.rice@chron.com Retrieved January 9, 2006 from http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/3571393

Ethics - Public Officials - San Diego, CA, Pension System

Kardasz: Ethical lapses in judgement among the decision makers of the San Diego, California pension system resulted in several indictments and severe financial hardship for the city.

Feds indict 5 in pension case Multiple felony charges include conspiracy, wire and mail fraud

From SignonSanDiego.com, By Kelly Thornton, Union Tribune, January 7, 2006

A federal grand jury indicted the former top executive of the San Diego pension system, its lawyer and three former trustees on conspiracy and fraud charges yesterday in the opening salvo in the federal government's latest corruption probe at City Hall.

Law enforcement sources said the indictments are the first part of a far-reaching criminal investigation that could stretch into the highest levels of city government. Lawrence Grissom, the former administrator of the San Diego City Employees Retirement System, and Loraine Chapin, the system's general counsel, were indicted along with firefighters union president Ronald Saathoff, former city human resources director Cathy Lexin, and former acting city auditor Teresa Webster. They were charged with multiple felonies, including conspiracy, wire and mail fraud and aiding and abetting.

Some of the 20 counts carry a five-year maximum penalty; others a 20-year maximum, though it's likely that any sentences would be far less. Assistant U.S. Attorneys said the five defendants would be arraigned at an undetermined date, perhaps next week. The indictment said the defendants conspired to illegally obtain enhanced retirement benefits for themselves – in one case as much as 35 percent higher – in exchange for allowing the financially strapped city to underfund the pension system. And, the indictment said, they did so in secret, concealing information from other pension board members and the public .

"The defendants had a duty to act in the best interests of the city retirement system," U.S. Attorney Carol Lam said in a statement. &q