Internet 'friends' - Myspace
| ||||
| ©The Saratogian 2006 |
« March 2006 | Main | May 2006 »
| ||||
| ©The Saratogian 2006 |
The Internet Control Dial
April 3, 2006, Dr. Frank Kardasz
I have had the opportunity to speak with citizen groups about Internet crime on many occasions, and at the end of each presentation audience members ask questions. There is often some senior individual in the group who raises a hand and asks with a concerned mature voice, "Why don't they just switch that whole dang Internet thing off!"...as if we have a control panel somewhere with a dial that we can turn and it will regulate Internet misconduct.
Legislation is the closest thing we have to an Internet control dial. Opponents of Internet control argue that regulations are costly, imperfect and draconian violations of constitutional freedoms. While absolute government control over the Internet is not only improper in a Democracy but as a practical matter impossible in the real world, I sometimes wonder what the framers of the Constitution would have thought if they had known what we now know about computers and the Internet. Would they have permitted the Internet crimes against children that we are witnessing today?
Survey of ICAC Affiliates
On March 31, 2006 I sent a survey to Internet crimes against children (ICAC) investigators at all of our nationwide affiliates throughout the United States.
The survey asked one question:
What law could be created or revised to best assist the investigators who work cases involving Internet crimes against children?
I received 35 responses from detectives, special agents and prosecutors in 17 states and the District of Columbia. The most frequent response involves data storage and retrieval by Internet service providers (ISP). The second most frequent response involved jurisdiction as it pertains to subpoenas and search warrants to Internet service providers.The following paragraphs briefly discuss each issue.
1. Data Storage and Retrieval by Internet Service Providers
Investigators need ISP's to retain subscriber and content information so that when legal process in the form of a subpoena or search warrant are obtained and served, there is information remaining with the ISP that will help investigators find the offender. Most ISP organizations are operated by conscientious and professional business people. Most of them are horrified by Internet crimes against children. Some ISP's have graciously extended themselves to help investigators. Some reluctant ISP's will only assist to the extent that the law mandates them to assist. Presently, the law requiring ISP's to report (42 USC 13032) is weak.
Because mandated data retention is a bottom-line cost issue, some ISP's will not comply unless a law is passed. Mandated data retention is not a draconian privacy violation. Law enforcement simply needs the data retained but not disclosed, except in response to legal process.
Internet industry professionals may cite the financial burden of data storage, but consider the potential human cost of not retaining data. For example, when law enforcement is seeking an Internet predator identifiable only by the subscriber information associated with his screen name, but the responsible ISP did not preserve the subscriber information, the investigation ends while the predator remains free.
Recommendations
A. Mandate that Internet service providers retain information about subscribers for at least one year.
B. Mandate that Internet service providers respond to subpoenas involving crimes against children investigations within one week of receiving a subpoena and more quickly under exigent circumstances.
Conclusion
The law enforcement personnel who are tasked with protecting children on-line need additional legal tools to help navigate those dark alleys of the Internet where they are working to help protect children. I recognize that turning the Internet control dial comes with a cost, but failing to turn the dial carries a greater human cost.
naplesnews.com, By Tracy X. Miguel, Thursday, March 30, 2006
There is only so much people can do without one day getting recognized. For Marco Island Police Department Cpl. Mike Peña, that day came Wednesday.
Peña was the first of three public servants in Collier County whom an entourage surprised at work with the Distinguished Public Service Award 2006 when he was called into a meeting room. More than one dozen officers, award committee members and friends waited for Peña to walk into the room at the station.
“Wow. What a surprise. I don’t even know what I’m here for,” said Peña, nodding his head. Award committee member Charles Connolly and committee chairman Martin De St. Pierre, vice president and trust officer of Bank of America Trust Services, presented the award to Peña.
Connolly told Peña it was an honor for him, a former police commissioner from New York, to present the award to a younger police officer. Upon receiving the award, Peña said, “Everything I do here, I do it for the community.”
Peña, who lives on Marco Island, said he had no idea he was about to receive an award, yet felt honored. “He deserves it. He is very humble,” said Peña’s wife, Mabel. For the third year the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce, Naples Daily News, Bank of America, Edison College and other organizations are sponsoring the awards. The awards were developed to honor public service workers for their dedication.
The awards are given to one member of Collier County law enforcement, a fire safety employee and an emergency medical services employee who have performed an extraordinary act of service that went beyond normal expectations. About 50 nominations were submitted for the three categories by residents and those working in the professions. A total of 24 nominations were received for the law enforcement category, said Brenda Borchardt, the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce vice president of programs.
Three committees reviewed the nominations and determined the three recipients of the annual Distinguished Public Service Award 2006. One by one, each recipient will be surprised at work with the arrival of the committee to acknowledge their outstanding work.
Peña, who is an officer in charge at the Marco Island Police Department, was nominated by his supervisor, Capt. Thom Carr. Peña started his law enforcement career in 1980 in Miami. He has been working in Marco Island for more than three years.
Carr, who nominated three officers from the department, said Peña is one of the outstanding officers whom the department consistently recognizes as officer of the month for his commitment to the community. In 2005, Peña solved several major cases, including recovery of $30,000 worth of stolen appliances and locating a suspect who had been charged with sexually assaulting a child.
“As long as we keep on getting guys like him we are in good shape,” said Carr. The second recipient of the a
ward will be surprised at work Friday. When the last recipient will be surprised has not been announced.
Naples Daily News and NDN Productions. Published in Naples, Florida, USA by the E.W. Scripps Co.
Retrieved April 1, 2006 from http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2006/mar/30/marco_police_officer_honored_his_service/?print=1
Milford Daily News, By Jennifer Kavanaugh
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
Framingham, MA - A routine traffic stop yesterday quickly turned into a life-or-death drama for a police officer when a sport utility vehicle careened toward his cruiser and flipped over trapping four occupants. Five people went to the hospital as a result of the 1:45 p.m., two-car crash at Concord and Sewell streets. And in the space of a few minutes, Officer Lester Baker went from trying to escape the crash to rescuing the four people from the Isuzu.
"He was a true hero, a life saver," said Lt. Paul Shastany, the department’s spokesman. "He was risking his life even though it could have exploded into flames at any time." Baker had pulled over a car on Concord Street to write a speeding ticket. After writing the ticket and sending the driver on his way, Baker sat in his cruiser finishing up the paperwork.
The Isuzu Rodeo was headed north on Concord Street, behind a van with one man in it. The Isuzu passed the van on the left even though there was only one lane, Shastany said. The Isuzu’s driver couldn’t pull in front of the van safely, and the two vehicles collided, he said. Baker saw the Isuzu hurtle toward his cruiser, Shastany said, and put the car in gear. He barely got out of the way before the SUV flipped and landed right where the cruiser was sitting. The van remained upright. When Baker got out of his cruiser, he saw smoke coming out of the Isuzu, and pulled three of the people out, Shastany said. He had to cut a seat belt to free the fourth person.
Assistant Fire Chief John Magri said one of passenger in the Isuzu was seriously, but not critically, injured. That passenger and another person were sent to an out-of-town hospital, he said, while the other three were taken to MetroWest Medical Center. He said it appears all five people in the accident were wearing seat belts.
The identity of the five people involved in the accident and details about their injuries were not available yesterday evening. The accident is still under investigation, police said. Shastany said the accident would have been worse if not for Baker’s quick actions. The incident earned him the praise of passersby, he said. "Les does not like this kind of attention," Shastany said. "He’s a very humble guy."
(Jennifer Kavanaugh can be reached at 508-626-4416 or at jkavanau@cnc.com.)
Retrieved April 1, 2006 from http://www.milforddailynews.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=88917&format=text
Billings Gazette, By Greg Tuttle, The Gazette Staff, Wednesday, March 29, 2006.
Billings, Montana
A Billings police officer alleges in a lawsuit that his bosses retaliated against him when he reported that fellow officers had taken illegal drugs from the department and had given them to a civilian. One command officer is alleged to have warned the officer to "just keep this between us," according to the lawsuit.
Officer Steven Feuerstein filed the lawsuit Tuesday in Yellowstone County District Court. The lawsuit names as defendants the city of Billings, the Billings Police Department, former police chiefs Ron Tussing and Jerry Archer, interim Police Chief Rich St. John, Capt. Dave Hinkel and Officer Dave Cardillo.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and lists six causes of action, including state and federal constitutional civil rights violations, workplace safety violations, negligent supervision and malice. It also seeks a court-ordered injunction preventing the Police Department from any further alleged acts of retaliation.
"We obviously will respond and defend the city and the defendants," interim City Administrator Tina Volek said Wednesday. The lawsuit is the latest in a serious of legal claims made against the Billings Police Department.
Three female officers have filed discrimination complaints with the state Human Rights Bureau. A state investigator recently dismissed a majority of the officers' claims, but found there was evidence to support one claim of discrimination. Two of the female officers last month filed new state claims alleging ongoing discrimination and retaliation. The cases are pending before the Human Rights Bureau.
Feuerstein is a patrol officer with 14 years of experience at the Billings Police Department. He is represented by Great Falls attorney Elizabeth Best, who could not be reached for comment Wednesday. Feuerstein states in the lawsuit that in February 2002 he reported to his immediate supervisor, then-Lt. Dave Hinkel, that two fellow officers had removed illegal drugs and given them to a civilian, who is not identified in the document. The lawsuit states the two officers, who also are not named in the suit, were involved sexually with the civilian.
When told of his concerns, Feuerstein alleges in the lawsuit, Hinkel responded by saying: "Let's just keep this between us." Hinkel, now a captain in charge of the department's detective division, could not be reached for comment Wednesday. St. John declined to comment.
The next month, Feuerstein states, he met with Tussing and a consultant who was reviewing the department's ethics policies at the consultant's hotel room. During the meeting, Feuerstein states, he told Tussing about the missing drugs and Hinkel's response. "Tussing took no action in response, instead simply passing the information reported by (Feuerstein) to then Deputy Chief Archer," the lawsuit states. "Archer did not take any action or investigate."
Tussing, who resigned as police chief last year and was subsequently elected mayor, could not be reached for comment Wednesday. Archer, who is now retired, declined to comment. The lawsuit states Feuerstein then reported the allegations of missing drugs to a federal Drug Enforcement Agency agent in June 2002.
In 2004 and 2005, Feuerstein repeated the allegation to then-City Administrator Kristoff Bauer, Assistant City Administrator Tina Volek and Deputy City Attorney Bonnie Sutherland, according to the lawsuit. "He further reported to them that money had been illegally removed from the Police Department evidence room and deposited in what he believed was a Police Foundation fund set up by Tussing," the lawsuit states. "He also reported that this misconduct had resulted in failed prosecutions because of missing and mishandled evidence."
Feuerstein also took his complaints to both the FBI and the police officer's union representative, Officer Dave Cardillo, the lawsuit states. Cardillo "conspired with the other individual defendants to deny him the opportunity to grieve or a fair hearing." Cardillo is on active military service and was unavailable for comment.
Feuerstein alleges that he has been retaliated against, harassed and demoted as a result of his efforts to report the mishandled drugs. At one time, Tussing and Archer "detained" him and "verbally accused and attacked him," according to the lawsuit. "Defendants have provided or permitted treatment based on cronyism and retaliation, rather than ability, training, experience and seniority," the lawsuit states.
The lawsuit has been assigned to Judge Ingrid Gustafson.
Retrieved April 1, 2006 from http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2006/03/29/news/local/16-complaint_x.prt
The Connection Newspapers
March 31, 2006, By Bonnie Hobbs
Farifax, Virginia
Steve Franklin Garrison, 53, of Chantilly, was arrested Oct. 6, 2005 by the Northern Virginia-Washington, D.C., Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force. A husband and father of three, he had been employed as a building inspector by Fairfax County, but resigned from his job four days after his arrest. According to a police warrant to search his home, he's accused of possessing child pornography in which some of the children were allegedly as young as 6 or 7 months old. The Task Force executed that warrant, Oct. 6, 2005, and seized 26 CDs and a Hewlett/Packard computer. Garrison is scheduled to enter a plea, May 9, in Circuit Court.
Retrieved April 1, 2006 from http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/article.asp?article=63837&paper=62&cat=104